NationTalk – SON’s claim is that the Crown could have protected the Peninsula and misled SON in the negotiations of a surrender of the Saugeen (Bruce) Peninsula. SON’s claim is that this was a breach of the Crown’s fiduciary duty. What SON is seeking is a declaration the Crown breached this duty. If successful, in a later phase of this claim, SON will be looking for recognition of its ownership interests in lands on the Saugeen (Bruce) Peninsula that are still owned by Ontario or Canada or have not been bought and paid for by third parties (so, municipal roads, for example), as well as compensation. This second claim is against Ontario and Canada, but also includes several municipalities that own open and unopened roads on the Saugeen (Bruce) Peninsula
https://nationtalk.ca/story/saugeen-ojibway-nation-trial-coming-to-an-end
Current Problems
Treaties and Land Claims
Saugeen First Nation Treaty 72 signed 1854
October 15, 2020Return to Previous Page
or
Continue Reading
Through generations, Mowachaht/Muchalaht fishers have been criminalized by the DFO
Nuchatlaht granted partial land title on Nootka Island
Liberal MP, senator call for public investigation into federal officers who stranded Mi’kmaw fishers
Cree lawyer says cows and plows settlements don’t reflect spirit of treaty clause